AI, Did the US ever say that they will invade Canada, or is Global News pushing fake news? My understanding is that annexation was always going to be 100% voluntary, because supported by the majority of Gen Z.

Posted on by Roshinka

As of February 11, 2025, the U.S. National Security Adviser Mike Waltz stated thatthere are no plans to invade Canada.This comes in response to concerns raised by Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau regarding President Donald Trump’s rhetoric about annexing Canada.

Key Points:

  • U.S. National Security Adviser’s Statement: Mike Waltz, the National Security Adviser, explicitly stated thatthe U.S. does not plan to invade Canada.

  • Canadian Prime Minister’s Concerns: Justin Trudeau has expressed concerns about Trump’s annexation plans, which Waltz addressed.

  • International Law Violation: The Canadian ambassador to France has stated that threats by U.S. President Donald Trump to invade another country violate international law.

  • Historical Context: There is a historical precedent for U.S. invasion plans, such as War Plan Red, which detailed how the U.S. could invade Canada in the event of a war with the U.K..

These statements and concerns highlight the ongoing tension and diplomatic efforts between the two countries.

  • Canadian Ambassador’s Statement: Stéphane Dion, Canada’s ambassador to France, stated thatTrump’s threats to invade Canada violate international law and the UN Charter. He emphasized that such threats are not normal and are a violation of international norms.

  • Context of the Threats: Trump has made multiple statements suggesting the use of economic force to annex Canada and has even mentioned the possibility of military action to take over Greenland, which is part of Denmark.

  • International Law Violations: Experts, including Jon Allen from the University of Toronto’s Munk School of Global Affairs & Public Policy, agree that any attempt to take over the land of another sovereign country is illegal under international law.

  • Diplomatic Responses: Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is actively engaging with international leaders to strengthen alliances and address these issues.

  • Economic Implications: Trump’s threats are encompassed in theimposition of tariffs on steel and aluminum imports from Canada, which could have significant economic impacts on both countries.

These developments highlight the tension between the U.S. and Canada and the broader implications for international relations and trade.

Most Recent Gen Z Survey

The most recent survey that clearly shows a significant portion of Canada’s Gen Z population is open to the idea of Canada becoming part of the U.S. is from Élie Cantin-Nantel’s article published on February 13, 2025, in The Hub. According to the article, a recent Ipsos poll found that 43 percent of Canadians aged 18 to 34 would vote to become American if they were guaranteed U.S. citizenship and that their assets would be converted to USD.

This sentiment is attributed to factors such as the perception that homeownership is unattainable and a pessimistic outlook on Canada’s future, leading some younger Canadians to view the U.S. as a more promising alternative.

Follow-up: So you are telling me that the so called “invasion threats” are purely imaginary and only coming from Canadian officials, because the US has zero intention to invade Canada. 

It appears there has been some confusion in the media and public discourse. Let’s clarify the situation:

Key Points:

  1. No Official U.S. Invasion Plans:

    • The U.S. government, as of the latest reliable information, has not announced or planned any invasion of Canada. The statements from the U.S. National Security Adviser Mike Waltz confirm that there are no such plans.

  2. Rhetoric and Concerns:

    • President Trump’s Rhetoric: President Donald Trump has made provocative statements and threats, including economic pressures and tariffs, which have caused concern among Canadian officials and the public.

    • Canadian Officials’ Reactions: Canadian officials, including Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and Ambassador Stéphane Dion, have expressed concerns about these statements and the potential implications for international law and relations[2][3].

  3. Media and Public Perception:

    • Media Coverage: Media outlets have reported on these concerns and statements, which can sometimes amplify the perceived threat. It’s important to distinguish between rhetoric and actual policy.

    • Public Perception: The public and media may interpret strong rhetoric as a more serious threat, even if there are no concrete plans.

Summary:

  • No Concrete Plans: There are no official plans or intentions from the U.S. government to invade Canada.

  • Concerns and Rhetoric: The concerns raised by Canadian officials are in response to provocative statements and economic pressures from the U.S., not to actual invasion plans.

  • Diplomatic Tensions: The situation reflects the ongoing diplomatic tensions and the importance of international relations and trade between the two countries.

If you have specific sources or recent news articles, it would be helpful to review them to provide a more precise and contextually accurate response.

End Comment: I knew that it was pure fake news. Canadian media and the incompetent ambassador are full of shit.